![]() Of course, this only goes so far – once the RF value is high enough, there’s no saving Jack’s facial features from the effects of compression!įor those interested, I’ve also got another page on this site that lets you compare x264 vs x265 vs VP8 vs VP9 (at various RF and bitrate settings).Ī static image isn’t always great, so here’s the 35-second video I made showcasing the difference between these RF settings in “24”. Worth noting that x264’s psychovisual enhancements (trellis, etc) do a pretty good job of keeping detail where you’d notice it (the face), at the expense of the stuff you normally wouldn’t notice while watching (like those background areas). Note that the first one (RF0) is for reference (lossless). Pictures should work for nearly everyone. There’s a video below too, but it comes with a bit of a caveat so might not show everything well for you. I’ll start with a few screenshots at different RF values. I tested the following RF values (listed in Handbrake under “Constant Quality”: Defaults for everything else (Handbrake 0.9.9 on OSX).If you have the same DVD and are looking to reproduce this test, the following settings were used: I started with encodes from the “24” DVD (Season 6, Episode 1). ![]() Here, I’m taking a look at various RF settings in Handbrake, both in terms of visuals and filesize.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |